Experimental Answer
The Thursday Challenge photo from last week was of a junk-jewelry necklace belonging to my daughter that seems to have found a “home” in the cup holder near the driver’s seat of my car. I looked at my camera settings for the two photos, and the only difference seems to be shutter speed, 1/40 for the experimental and 1/50 for the boring, shows you exactly what it is photo.
East Gwillimbury WOW! says
Who'd have guessed the beads would look so pretty in the cup holder?
Robin says
You sneaky little thing you. I was sure it had something to do with lights.
Great job Leora.
lawstude says
i love the shot. great job.
kung hei fat choi. (happy new year in chinese)
Mrs. S. says
Mystery solved!
:-)
Chodesh tov.
Leora says
Mrs. S, and a Happy New Moon to you, too! I'm hoping to write about the symbol of the moon in Judaism this week. It's in the parsha...
AscenderRisesAbove says
I thought they were some sort of berry; fun to stop and ponder what they were.
Ilana-Davita says
Funny; I would never have guessed theses dots were beads.
soulbrush says
also fits the ruby tuesday theme so well.
Mojo says
I never would've gotten it. Not if I'd guessed for a year.
Shutter speed was the only exposure setting that was different... but what about focal length?
Leora says
Mojo, I keep looking at the camera data, and for both it says focal length is 19.6. (Reading camera data is a bit like reading Russian to me; I actually took a little Russian, but rarely understand what I am reading. If I said it were like reading Greek or Chinese, I would be lying, because I know a little more about camera data than that).
I suppose I was probably holding the camera a bit closer to the subject in the experimental one. I'll have to try taking a similar photo again, to see if I can mimic this or get something similar.
The Jewish Side says
I wouldn't have been able to guess that.
but now I can see why it would cause the reflections.
Please leave a comment! I love to hear from you.